star wars mistake

shit...dun feel like typing...cuz i typed something earlier...but it got deleted cuz i din save it...bah...it's abt star wars la...how the prequels look more stylo and advanced than the sequels...hahah...ya...damn buay song now...see if got time i will remember wad i wrote last time and ya...if got time i will type it out...

anyway, the gist of wad i typed was the difference in the look of the only female lead characters in the star wars sequels and prequels, in which the sequels having a more retro look than that of the prequels where in real life...this shouldn't be the case right? it's like as if the empire retrofied the entire galaxy... ha...show u eg. later. with the help of princess leia(retro) and padme amidala(stylo). note that the former is supposed to be the latter's daughter in the star wars saga.

eg. princess leia

the lifelong question of "wad was lucas thinking when he gave her those "buns" for her hair?!" reminds me of the delifrance sultanna pastry.

compare her make up with natalie portman's padme character:

oh my...maybe that's why leia has the "buns" hair...like mother like daughter...haha

the first one more retro hor...maybe this teaches wannabe directors a lesson...never do ur prequels too long after ur sequels, if u want, can, but must continue ur prequels in the style of the sequels la...

11th day in cast...